孟山都保護(hù)法，是埋藏在今年3月經(jīng)美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)通過(guò)的撥款法案HR933中的第735款，正式名稱是“農(nóng)場(chǎng)主擔(dān)保條款”，國(guó)會(huì)通過(guò)后經(jīng)奧巴馬簽署而成為了法律，終因美國(guó)人民的堅(jiān)決反對(duì)，在9月底征集到所需要的60萬(wàn)以上簽名后，被永久性廢除了。這是一個(gè)多么偉大的勝利!為什么我們一直不知道呢?因?yàn)樗械闹髁髅襟w都“步調(diào)一致”地保持了徹底的沉默!當(dāng)HR933通過(guò)國(guó)會(huì)批準(zhǔn)時(shí)，它們高呼美國(guó)政府支持孟山都和轉(zhuǎn)基因;而民眾運(yùn)動(dòng)把它廢除掉了，媒體卻“步調(diào)一致”地對(duì)這個(gè)罕見的重大事件緘口沉默——孟山都公司養(yǎng)的律師不少于開基因槍的技術(shù)專家，這個(gè)公司不僅能操縱市場(chǎng)，操縱媒體，玩弄生命，還能操縱法律，制定法律，但是它不可能“搞定”人民。

　　主流媒體想不說(shuō)啥就不說(shuō)啥，所以我們直到現(xiàn)在才知道，“孟山都保護(hù)法”已經(jīng)永久廢除了!美國(guó)公眾反對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因的運(yùn)動(dòng)最近進(jìn)展很大，杰弗里.史密斯(Jeffery Smith) 剛剛親口告知!

　　“孟山都保護(hù)法”的核心內(nèi)容是：即使孟山都公司的轉(zhuǎn)基因農(nóng)作物被發(fā)現(xiàn)對(duì)人身體有害、造成了環(huán)境污染，即使該公司被告上法庭，即使在訴訟期間，也就是說(shuō)在任何情況下，孟山都公司都無(wú)需停止“生產(chǎn)”和銷售，法院不能強(qiáng)制孟山都公司停止行動(dòng)，也就是說(shuō)，在任何情況下聯(lián)邦法院也沒有辦法對(duì)孟山都公司實(shí)行制裁。在美國(guó)這樣法制完善的國(guó)家里，如果連最高司法機(jī)關(guān)都不能采取任何手段制止孟山都的任何行為，還有什么人能合法挑戰(zhàn)它呢?

　　美國(guó)的反轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)動(dòng)取得巨大進(jìn)展，這是人民大眾團(tuán)結(jié)一心拼死斗爭(zhēng)得來(lái)的勝利!在孟山都保護(hù)法出籠期間，“立即實(shí)行糧食民主”運(yùn)動(dòng)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人戴夫.墨菲，不僅深刻揭露了孟山都保護(hù)法、成功地引導(dǎo)了公眾關(guān)注，他還帶頭站在最前線，在白宮門口抗議，即使奧巴馬簽署了法案，生米似乎已經(jīng)煮成了熟飯，他們?nèi)匀粵]有放棄，他們堅(jiān)持斗爭(zhēng)直到9月底，終于征集到所需的60萬(wàn)以上的簽名，永久性廢除了“孟山都保護(hù)法”。

　　如果沒有美國(guó)人民的堅(jiān)持，孟山都公司保護(hù)法將會(huì)像達(dá)摩克利斯之劍一樣，懸掛在全人類的頭上!在中國(guó)，我們扛住了轉(zhuǎn)基因利益集團(tuán)推進(jìn)轉(zhuǎn)基因水稻產(chǎn)業(yè)化的一次重點(diǎn)進(jìn)攻。拉鋸戰(zhàn)又開場(chǎng)了，國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心的韓俊副主任今天聲稱，要對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因更加開放，那就來(lái)試試吧。

　　轉(zhuǎn)基因窮途末路，早已風(fēng)光不再，任何人上了賊船不想下，都請(qǐng)便。不管還要猖狂多久，轉(zhuǎn)基因必?cái)　２还苓€要打多少個(gè)回合，人民必勝。

附：烏有編譯：奧巴馬簽署《孟山都保護(hù)法》 該法案系孟山都撰寫

　　（2013-03-31 ）據(jù)報(bào)道，盡管有25萬(wàn)人聯(lián)署反對(duì)，奧巴馬上周二還是簽署了這一埋藏在78頁(yè)法律中的《孟山都保護(hù)法》。該法案有利于孟山都等轉(zhuǎn)基因公司向民眾兜售轉(zhuǎn)基因作物，即使出現(xiàn)對(duì)人身體有害或者造成環(huán)境污染的情況下，也能避免聯(lián)邦法院的制裁。許多食品安全的倡導(dǎo)者認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在還沒有對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因種子和作物的潛在危害做足夠的研究，若潛在危害顯露時(shí)，法律是阻止轉(zhuǎn)基因公司兜售和種植轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的關(guān)鍵手段。然而《孟山都保護(hù)法案》的簽署使得民眾無(wú)法再用法律手段來(lái)維護(hù)自己的權(quán)利。

       據(jù)IB Times 揭露，這個(gè)法案由孟山都支持的共和黨議員Roy Blunt提出，由Blunt與孟山都共同撰寫.

       另?yè)?jù)華盛頓時(shí)報(bào)指出，這個(gè)法案的通過(guò)被許多像先正達(dá)公司、美國(guó)嘉吉公司和孟山都視為勝利，這些公司自2009年以來(lái)就向國(guó)會(huì)捐助750萬(wàn)美元，以及向參議院撥款委員會(huì)捐助37.2萬(wàn)美元。（據(jù)今日俄羅斯，IB Times 等）

　　Furor Growing Against Obama Over 'Monsanto Protection Act'

　　原文鏈接：http://www.ibtimes.com/furor-growing-against-obama-over-monsanto-protection-act-1156459#

　　Anger is growing against President Barack Obama the day after he signed into law a spending bill that included a provision opponents have dubbed the "Monsanto Protection Act."

　　food and public safety advocates and independent farmers are furious that Obama signed it despite its inclusion of language that they consider to be a gift to Monsanto Company (NYSE:MON) and other firms that produce genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or genetically engineered (GE) seeds and crops.

　　And protesters have spent the past couple of days demonstrating in front of the White House, first calling on Obama to veto the bill, and now criticizing him for his failure to do so.

　　The protests come on the heels of a massive petition campaign organized by the advocacy group Food Democracy Now, which gathered the signatures of more than 200,000 people who wanted Obama to veto HR 933 in order to stop Section 735 -- the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act" -- from being codified into law.

　　But Obama ignored it, instead choosing to sign a bill that effectively bars federal courts from being able to halt the sale or planting of GMO or GE crops and seeds, no matter what health consequences from the consumption of these products may come to light in the future.

　　"This provision is simply an industry ploy to continue to sell genetically engineered seeds even when a court of law has found they were approved by USDA illegally," the petition stated. "It is unnecessary and an unprecedented attack on U.S. judicial review. Congress should not be meddling with the judicial review process based solely on the special interest of a handful of companies."

　　Many food safety advocates maintain that there have not been enough studies into the potential health risks of GMO and GE seeds and crops, and the judicial power to stop companies from selling or planting them was one key recourse they were relying on to stop them from being sold if health risks come to light.

　　But the "Monsanto Protection Act" -- referred to as the "Farmer Assurance Provision" by its supporters -- removes that course of action, and those who are angry at Obama for signing the bill are also incensed with Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D- Md., who is accused of failing to give the amendment that inserted the language a proper hearing.

　　附文：

　　Monsanto Wrote Monsanto Protection Act

　　原文鏈接：http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/448-farm-and-food-policy/16689-focus-monsanto-wrote-monsanto-protection-act 

　　'Monsanto Protection Act' slips silently through US Congress

　　http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-congress-silently-slips-830/

　　So, just how much of a victory is this for biotech companies like Monsanto? Critics are thus far alarmed by the very way in which the provision made it through Congress -- the rider was introduced anonymously as the larger bill progressed through the Senate Appropriations Committee. Now, groups like the Center for Food Safety are holding Senator Mikulski (D-MD), chairman of that committee, to task and lobbing accusations of a “backroom deal” with the biotech industry.

　　As the Washington Times points out, the provision’s success is viewed by many as a victory by companies like Syngenta Corp, Cargill, Monsanto and affiliated PACs that have donated $7.5 million to members of Congress since 2009, and $372,000 to members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

× 烏有之鄉(xiāng) WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站，宣傳紅色文化！

歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉(xiāng)網(wǎng)刊微信公眾號(hào)